You posted this information 12 days after the Columbia
Association voted to allow the CA attorney’s assessment to be publicized.
Nowhere in your commentary do you mention Ms. Fanaroff’s opinion. Understandably,
you don’t because it runs counter to your argument. Your reporting, which is
actually commentary, is purporting to detail the events after the last CA
meeting. Leaving out her opinion means that you are potentially lying, or at
least misrepresenting the situation, to your constituents.
I find it odd that you are proceeding in this manner, given that
you claim that the Inner Arbor Trust was conceived in secrecy. Your actions
& words display a covert, secretive edge. You have decided you don’t like
something so you will lie and mislead people.
Thank you for apologizing to Mr. Matthews for presenting his
testimony to the Planning Board. As the President, he should be the voice for
CA publicly. Once something is approved, he should champion that idea. I only
wish that you could come before the PB to apologize for your mistake. These
situations, unfortunately, demonstrate the lack of professionalism that you
have brought to the CA board.